The government has resurrected the plans for a cap on public sector exit payments and has published two documents for consultation. The consultation closes on 3 July 2019. The following categories of public sector employer are within scope of these regulations where they fall within the responsibility of the UK government, regarding their employment: · the UK Civil Service, its executive agencies, non-ministerial departments and non-departmental public bodies (including Crown non-departmental public bodies and Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service) · the NHS in England and Wales · academy schools · local government including fire authorities’ employees and maintained schools · police forces, including civilian and uniformed officers All public sector employers should make value for money decisions on exit payments and spend public money responsibly. The cap remains – Read More…
A gay Headteacher dismissed for having sex with two 17-year olds he met through a dating app.
Background Mr Aplin was an openly gay Headteacher at Tywyn Primary School. He was suspended by the school on 1 September 2015 after they were notified that Mr Aplin had consensual sexual intercourse with two 17-year-old boys after meeting them through an internet dating website. The website required joining individuals to certify that they are at least 18 years of age. Mr Aplin’s case was that he believed they were at least 18 years of age. The boys were not pupils of the school. An investigation was conducted into whether Mr Aplin’s conduct had brought the school into disrepute, whether his conduct outside work had undermined his ability to fulfil his role, and whether it displayed a gross error of judgment such as to undermine the school’s confidence in him. – Read More…
Beattie v Condorrat War Memorial and Social Club and others
Background Mrs Beattie commenced employment with a Social Club within which there are three bars where events on functions are held, on 25th July 2008 as a Bar Steward. She was dismissed on 29th December 2015. In May 2015, a stock shortage of alcohol was identified. Mrs Beattie was asked to meet with the Executive Committee to discuss the matter on 2nd July 2015. She offered no explanation to the committee and was issued a final written warning on 9th July 2015. Mrs Beattie appealed this decision, but the sanction was upheld. In November 2015, Mrs Beattie informed members of the committee she was unwilling to sell function tickets behind the bar as she was concerned about money going missing. Mrs Beattie was asked several times to sell the tickets – Read More…
Spaceman v ISS Mediclean Ltd (t/a ISS Facility Service Healthcare) UKEAT/0142/18
Appeal against the ET’s striking out of a claim by the Claimant that he had been unfairly dismissed by virtue of s 104 Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA”) for asserting a statutory right. Appeal dismissed. Background Mr Spaceman was employed by the Respondent with effect from 13 October 2015 as a dispatch porter in West Middlesex University Hospital. He worked night shifts from an office shared with female staff employed on a help desk by a client of the Respondent. In April 2017 one of those female employees made an allegation against the Claimant of sexual harassment and assault. Mr Spaceman was suspended and in early May, two others made similar allegations. On 31st May 2016, a disciplinary hearing took place. Mr John Neckles, a Trade Union Official, represented Mr – Read More…
New guidance from the BEIS on how to calculate holidays is published after alarming lack of awareness from both Employer and Employee
New guidance on calculation of holidays published On 25th February 2019 the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) published guidance on how to calculate holiday entitlement correctly. This has come from a Government backed campaign to prevent workers losing out on holiday pay after an alarming lack of awareness from both Employers and Employees. The guidance explains how to calculate holidays in many circumstances. The BEIS made a statement saying “We want to see more businesses getting holiday pay right for their workers, helping to maintain a fair working environment for all. The onus is on you, as a responsible employer, to check your workers are receiving the correct amount”. There is also an online calculator that can be used to check statutory holiday entitlement (this will not – Read More…
Grant to support disabled people in the workplace increases to almost £60,000
Disabled employees will be able to benefit from almost £60,000 a year to assist them at work, the Minister for Disabled People announced in Parliament on 11 February 2019. From 1 April 2019 people will now be able to claim up to £59,200 annually to help pay for additional support that they may need in the workplace through the government’s Access to Work scheme. This can include workplace adaptations, assistive technology, transport and interpreters. It comes after the government increased the cap by almost a third last year. Now, even more people will be able to benefit, especially those from the deaf community who can get BSL interpreters through the scheme. Access to Work provides financial support to ensure someone’s disability or health condition doesn’t hold them back at work, – Read More…
Employment Appeals Tribunal considers if dismissing a teacher at an ultra-orthodox Jewish nursery who refused to lie about living with her boyfriend is discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief
Ms De Groen was employed as a teacher in a Jewish nursery. The nursery was run by Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd in accordance with ultra-orthodox Chabad principles. At a barbeque where parents were present, the teacher’s boyfriend revealed that they lived together which was against the beliefs of ultra-orthodox Jews. The teacher was dismissed after it had become known that she was living with her boyfriend. At a meeting with the headteacher and the managing director, the teacher was told that her private life was of no concern to the nursery, but it did risk damaging the reputation of the nursery. The teacher was asked to confirm that she no longer lived with her boyfriend so that the nursery could tell any concerned parents. The teacher refused to lie and – Read More…
Appeal against the ET’s finding that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed (Hamilton v Solomon And Wu Ltd UKEAT/0126/18/RN).
The Claimant was employed by the Respondent company from 30 August 2016 until 22 November 2016 as a joiner. The claimant has insufficient length of service to claim ordinary unfair dismissal. He claimed unfair dismissal under s 100(1)(d) ERA 1996 by reason of the dust in the workshop where he worked. The Claimant was line managed by Ms Paula Groves, Head of Resin Panel Production, who in turn reported to Mr Solomon. The Claimant’s work was to sand and polish and sometimes cut the resin panels in the workshop and occasionally install the products on site. On 21 November 2016, Mr Solomon gave the Claimant a task to do under Ms Groves’ instruction using a new belt sander, the Wadkins sander. Ms Groves was also collecting data about the new – Read More…
EAT overturn Employment Tribunal decision that Employee off with PTSD was not disabled
The Claimant, Ms Lamb had been employed at The Garrard Academy (the School) as a teacher. Ms Lamb went off sick on 29th February 2012 because of depression and alleged bullying at work. In March 2012 the Claimant raised a grievance about two incidents against the deputy headteacher at the School. The first incident related to the deputy head informing the Claimant that she was responsible for making a boy feel suicidal but failed to name the boy. The second incident related to the Claimant passing on to the Deputy Head written complaints that a pupil had used racist language, the Deputy Head put them in the bin without looking at them. The Claimant’s grievance was investigated by the School’s Head of HR. The Head of HR upheld the Claimant’s – Read More…
Employees right to have statement of employment particulars when employed for less than 2 months
This was an appeal following a decision made by the Employment Tribunal. Part of the appeal asked whether or not section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA 1996”) entitles an employee to a written statement of terms and conditions of employment if his or her employment ends between one and two months after the beginning of employment. The Claimants were employed by Maritime Hotel as waiting staff; all had short periods of employment. The Claimants were provided with accommodation at the hotel. None of them were given a section 1 statement of terms and conditions at any time during the course of their employment or thereafter. One claimant, Ms Woronowicz was employed for only 6 weeks, she complained as her employer had failed to provide a statement of employment – Read More…